bonfInfinite.Rd
This funcion is deprecated, please use Alpha_spending
instead.
bonfInfinite(
d,
alpha = 0.05,
alphai,
random = TRUE,
date.format = "%Y-%m-%d"
)
Either a vector of p-values, or a dataframe with three columns: an identifier (`id'), date (`date') and p-value (`pval'). If no column of dates is provided, then the p-values are treated as being ordered in sequence, arriving one at a time.
Overall significance level of the FDR procedure, the default is 0.05.
Optional vector of \(\alpha_i\), where hypothesis \(i\) is rejected if the \(i\)-th p-value is less than or equal to \(\alpha_i\). A default is provided as proposed by Javanmard and Montanari (2018), equation 31.
Logical. If TRUE
(the default), then the order of the
p-values in each batch (i.e. those that have exactly the same date) is
randomised.
Optional string giving the format that is used for dates.
A dataframe with the original data d
(which
will be reordered if there are batches and random = TRUE
), the
adjusted signifcance thresholds alphai
and the indicator function of
discoveries R
, where R[i] = 1
corresponds to hypothesis
\(i\) being rejected (otherwise R[i] = 0
).
Implements online FDR control using a Bonferroni-like test.
The function takes as its input either a vector of p-values, or a dataframe with three columns: an identifier (`id'), date (`date') and p-value (`pval'). The case where p-values arrive in batches corresponds to multiple instances of the same date. If no column of dates is provided, then the p-values are treated as being ordered in sequence, arriving one at a time.
The procedure controls FDR for a potentially infinite stream of p-values by using a Bonferroni-like test. Given an overall significance level \(\alpha\), we choose a (potentially infinite) sequence of non-negative numbers \(\alpha_i\) such that they sum to \(\alpha\). Hypothesis \(i\) is rejected if the \(i\)-th p-value is less than or equal to \(\alpha_i\).
Javanmard, A. and Montanari, A. (2018) Online Rules for Control of False Discovery Rate and False Discovery Exceedance. Annals of Statistics, 46(2):526-554.